Phorun Foreign Policy

Was following a post in response to Rahul Gandhi’s comment, don’t fuss over Pak, doesn’t deserve half the attention it gets.... I do not agree to the comments made by him. Those who have little to lose in fight are generally considered the most unpredictable and thus a major threat. I don’t have an enough background of Pakistan and China disputed territories but war from any of state will surely took us many years back. We just struggled through a global economic recession and battling once more will neither help us nor them.

China for surely is an upcoming respectful, powerful country with great and sharp policies which no other country has but even India has proven many things. In these last six decades we raised from nowhere. Today we provide international markets with great availability of man power under democracy which is not a funny business. Yes corruption is surely a curse but that’s parcel of democracy. I doubt any democracy is possible without its pros and cons. Freedom comes with great responsibility but only to Spiderman not to mango people! That's why there is only one spider man with no vote rights and ration card.

I would rather call it competition (Indo-China) than war but surely we are threat to each other, threat of overtaking one another but not destroying one another. It’s not a school fight that one can remain untouched and the other gets bashed completely. If a super power like US can regret on their wars then anyone could. And surely US will not keep cool on dollars’ loosing charm, they will have their plans too. May be the one we discussing, let us fight (Ind-Chn) or let us make fight so that they win! Any fight in which you are not involved is always good for you, if nothing than at least you will get a good name with one noble peace award!

I read some days back about threat on communist system of China on their next term. An Indian ex EA expert has a view that they may use the war “situation” to gain the power. Tibet is already troubling them internally and internationally. They can’t afford to lose their allies with other countries after disturbing a great market like India. The global economy will get disturbed, dramatically. Some people even trying to relate it with 2012 theory, I doubt.

Just read an interesting respond to a post on same issue, says Chanakya said that we should acquire territories of weak neighbors and develop friendship with strong neighbors if acquisition isn't likely. Otherwise, there will remain instability with the neighbor. In the old days, kings used to achieve marry someone from the other side, thus prevent being attacked - by becoming relatives instead of enemies. In the modern days, and in democracy, that is not possible. However, we should have an alternative to marriage - something which gives sufficient incentive to the other countries to not want to be aggressive. It could be trade relations, raw materials and resources, or cooperation in research, etc. China depends a lot on the US as a consumer of its goods. Maybe India should make China similarly dependent on us.